§ 7.5.3. Applications for variances; and criteria to be used by the zoning board of appeals in deciding applications for variances.  


Latest version.
  • The zoning board of appeals shall hear and decide applications for variances from the strict application of the regulations of this chapter and chapter 21 where the strict application of any regulation enacted under said chapters would result in exceptional and undue hardship upon the owner of such property. In determining whether or not to grant a variance, the board shall apply the criteria specified in this section to the facts of each case. The board may attach reasonable conditions to any approved variance in accordance with section 7.3.9. Once imposed, conditions shall become an integral part of the approved variance and shall be enforced as such. No changes to an approved condition attached to a variance shall be authorized except by re-application to the zoning board of appeals in full compliance with the applicable provisions of this division. No relief may be granted or action taken under the terms of this division unless such relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without substantial impairment of the intent and purpose of this chapter and the comprehensive plan. The zoning board of appeals shall apply the following criteria to the types of applications specified below as follows:

    A.

    Variances from the provisions or requirements of this chapter other than variances described in section 7.5.4 shall be authorized only upon making all of the following findings in writing:

    1.

    By reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific lot, or by reason of exceptional topographic and other site conditions (such as, but not limited to, floodplain, major stand of trees, steep slope), which were not created by the owner or applicant, the strict application of the requirements of this chapter would deprive the property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the same zoning district.

    2.

    The requested variance does not go beyond the minimum necessary to afford relief, and does not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the zoning district in which the subject property is located.

    3.

    The grant of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the zoning district in which the subject property is located.

    4.

    The literal interpretation and strict application of the applicable provisions or requirements of this chapter would cause undue and unnecessary hardship.

    5.

    The requested variance would be consistent with the spirit and purpose of this chapter and the DeKalb County Comprehensive Plan text.

    B.

    Appeals of decisions regarding building architectural design standards shall be evaluated using the same criteria as section 7.6.7.B.

    C.

    Appeals to the height standards, but not to add stories, shall be evaluated using the criteria as follows:

    1.

    Adequacy of the size of the site for the use contemplated and whether or not adequate land area is available for the proposed use including provision of all required yards, open space, off-street parking, and all other applicable requirements of the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located.

    2.

    Compatibility of the proposed use with adjacent properties and land uses and with other properties and land uses in the district.

    3.

    Adequacy of public services, public facilities, and utilities to serve the proposed use.

    4.

    Whether or not the proposed use provides for all required buffer zones and transitional buffer zones where required by the regulations of the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located.

    5.

    Whether or not the size, scale and massing of proposed buildings are appropriate in relation to the size of the subject property and in relation to the size, scale and massing of adjacent and nearby lots and buildings.

    6.

    Whether or not the proposed use will create a negative shadow impact on any adjoining lot or building as a result of the proposed building height.

( Ord. No. 15-06 , 8-25-2015)